"This is an erosion of civil liberties and it needs to be opposed from every quarter of society.
"What will be next? 52 days? 62 days? The right not to be imprisoned by state without charge or reason are elements of British freedom dating back to the Magna Carta.
Well there you have it in short form: the Gospel of Davis and fair enough as far as it goes.
Here it goes as far as the Jamia Mosque on Woodlands Road, Cheetham Hill, maybe a quarter mile from where I sit blogging resplendant. The speaker is Imran Rizvi, a local Tory activist, and he was addressing a post Friday prayer protest meeting. Opportunistc? It would be naïve to assume anything else. But his audience weren’t cynical.
His sentiments were echoed by many in the crowd, including Mohamed Siddiq, 67, also of Lansdowne Rd, who said: "This law is wrong. This is a country that values democracy and the rights of the people, and we are proud of it on that score, but unfortunately this law infringes on individual freedom and liberty."
Meanwhile, Mohamed Harif, 54, of St Kilda's Drive, Cheetham Hill postulated that the bill was passed simply to make the government appear to be acting on terrorism.
"I think they have done this because of pressure" he said. "Passing the law to try and show that they're doing something about terrorism, but there isn't any real need for it".
Actually, maybe they were being cynical. It’s easy to doughnut the guy from the local happy shopper paper with activists. But then we have the fact that the Tories now seem to have the activists to do it: the Tory vote in this ward went up by two or three hundred at the last local election. There are various reasons for this, I think, and it was obviously before 42 days was rammed through parliament. But everyone knows that this is the latest measure in a legislative architecture designed to target some before others. Here’s the local MP’s reaction:
Blackley MP Graham Stringer, who voted in favour of the bill said: "I thought long and hard before voting because I wasn't very enamoured with it, but ultimately it's a reserve power. I doubt it will ever be used.”
This is quite apologetic in a way: Stringer doesn’t need the votes, and a lot of them will be going over to the new Broughton constituency. But he used to be leader of the local council, and like any good city boss he knows where the votes are and why they do what they do. As a Labour man, he votes the party way. But also as a Labour man, he mourns a local instance of the general disintegration of the coalition that put him and his party in office. You can probably track it equally well in other places with other demographics.
Stringer was the first to call for Brown to go, incidentally – or maybe not.
Recent Comments