I’m not finding the new Hong Kong identity terribly impressive, frankly. Especially if it’s based on stuff like this, which is just outright bigotry. I’d also like to know how it squares with the fact that the SAR’s pro-Beijing parties are doing pretty well right now in such elections as the government allows, though it’s not altogether surprising that a sour ‘little Hong Konger’ sentiment coexists with growing support for a reactionary populist outfit like the DAB.
Hong Kong used to be bigger than that. I have a tale of when Hong Kong patriotism operated at a more edified level. I was sworn to secrecy at the time, but I think that now it can be told.
We’re talking the early to mid nineties when Patten was in charge and negotiations were underway for the final handover. Except that some of the then colony’s negotiators were determined to try and make sure that it wasn’t just going to be a handover. These were people at fairly senior levels in the Hong Kong civil service; proper Hong Kong people, who didn’t subscribe to the notion that the place had been lifted up by the blessed Cowperthwaite for the edification of happy, hard working munchkins, but was largely built by Chinese labour, capital and cultural assertion. Being within the civil service, they were constrained for pushing for more democracy. What they did want was universal access to British citizenship, not so that they could come to Britain, but so that they could deal with their new masters with the knowledge that they were not captives.
This was not something that went down well, partly because of the usual immigration scare rubbish and partly because human capital was part of the handover deal. The option would be raised in relevant meetings between Hong Kong and London, the option would be ignored along with its presenter and then the serious people would talk of serious things.
Finally, someone had enough After being told that any generous passport deal was ‘completely off the table’, he went into a splendid rant: he wanted London to know, once and for all, that Hong Kong people had no intention of flocking to their miserable, cold racist little island. What they wanted was the option to leave if things went wrong. This request was entirely reasonable in the light of the fact that their diligence and enterprise had enabled Britain to emerge from its disgraceful colonial history with some of its reputation intact. Then he walked out.
And that is how current Hong Kong SAR Chief Executive Donald Tsang came to choose China.
For what it’s worth I got that from someone who got it from someone who was there.
Recent Comments