Charlie Brooker waffles on about Barack Obama a bit before getting to the real issue of the day: shuffling versus running zombies. That in turn is based on Simon Pegg’s article condemning Brooker for the liveliness of his zombies in Dead Set. Raised as I was on George Romero’s films, I’m a shuffler by inclination and tradition. I’m a shuffler by nature anyway. Also, they’re supposed to be dead. Having them run around the place just insults the dignity of zombietude. Anyway, Brooker puts forward the following arguments.
And that would have ruined an otherwise eminently credible plotline about Britain being taken over by the Cannibal Dead.
Well, alright. There’s no reason why they couldn’t be slow generally and then pick up a remarkable turn of speed, like a pensioner suddenly realising he's walked halfway across a dual carriageway. The shuffling is supposed to suggest inevitability not predictability.
Oh, come on. Media London’s full of rich kids poncing about as runners and interns and gofers on daddy’s allowance. And they’re all media tarts. Just get them all in one place and tell them to behave as they usually do. Badabing! Also, like I say, old folks. They come cheap and shuffle as a matter of course.
But these are quibbles. The meat of the issue is that surely this week, of all weeks, we should be honouring the memory of the glorious undead.
I'm inclined to agree. At the same time, Brooker's idea of zombies which start off able to run and slow down as they decompose, has some appeal.
But running or walking, Dead Set achieved, for me, a far more authentic, claustrophobic Romeroian apocalypse than Shaun managed. So it's not a deal-breaker.
Posted by: Larry Teabag | November 10, 2008 at 10:15 PM
Aaargh! It's started? How many episodes have I missed?
I love Charlie Brooker.
Posted by: Madam Miaow | November 12, 2008 at 10:21 PM