John Galt dies, becomes social worker:
As the story progresses, especially in Freedom, the Darknet becomes the nucleus of a human social organization, its overall makeup shifting as the initial thousands of sociopaths and misfits recruited are followed by the millions of normal people attracted by an idealistic vision of a better life. And that human social organization, as per Sobol’s plan, supercedes the Daemon in importance and begins to exist for its own purposes. The new human society organized through the Darknet, we learn, was Sobol’s objective all along: to create a resilient, networked successor society that would continue after global corporate capitalism collapsed from all of its assorted pathologies. The Daemon, and all the spectacular combat capabilities associated with it, was just a midwife; or as one character puts it, “Sobol was willing to be our villain to force necessary change.” Sobol’s avatar argues, at one point in the story, that absent a takeover by the Daemon the inevitable collapse of global capitalism would have led to the death of billions.
And at last, a real Green Defence policy:
As the networked production facilities continue to expand, economies built around meeting real human needs—instead of building cool fighting vehicles—become the primary focus.
Plus some meaty commentary by Kevin Carson. Via John Robb, not surprisingly.
Shorter version: magic man conjures benevolent demon that solves all the world's problems. Hard to take seriously an idea whose central premise is so preposterous.
Posted by: Cian | April 28, 2010 at 10:24 AM
I always find Carson tremendously interesting, but whenever I see his byline I'm instantly distracted: "KEVIN CARSON, DUN da dun da da derrrrrr dedowdodowdedow, KEVIN CAA-HA-HA-SON".
Posted by: BenSix | April 28, 2010 at 10:33 AM
Centralized planning works if you're a super intelligent AI invented by a game designer (Farmville takes over the world - everyone brace themselves when Sid Meier kicks the bucket). I think Ken MacLeod got there first with The Space Fraction and The Cassini Division. Neal Stephenson did the distributed computing platform supporting a network of anonymous agents in The Diamond Age.
Posted by: Fellow Traveller | April 28, 2010 at 03:32 PM
Iain M Banks got there before MacLeod - the Culture's a communist state run by superintelligent AIs.
Bruce Sterling's "Maneki Neko" is about a gift-based economy overseen by distributed AI and the hopeless attempts of an IRS agent to tax it.
Posted by: ajay | April 28, 2010 at 03:37 PM
a gift-based economy overseen by distributed AI and the hopeless attempts of an IRS agent to tax it.
Imputing a cash value to a non-cash transaction being, of course, completely beyond the ability of tax authorities worldwide.
Posted by: Richard J | April 28, 2010 at 03:48 PM
Not that so much, IIRC, as the fact that the transactions just aren't being recorded anywhere, and sometimes aren't even recognised as being transactions and not just random serendipitous events.
Posted by: ajay | April 28, 2010 at 04:05 PM
Sterling's Distraction (1998) shares a lot of plotmatter with this as well. I mean, nanotech/biotech + home fabbing as a rebel military-industrial complex is routine cutting edge today. '98? Really prescient.
Posted by: Alex | April 28, 2010 at 10:43 PM
Iain Bank's take on the culture is essentially ironic. You can have utopia, so long as you accept being the pets of godlike benevolent AIs... Which is basically what most of the major religions believe, right?
Its kind of ironic that Keven Carson is praising a book whose basic premise is so un-libertarian. Paradise is reached through a god. Not only does this seem unlikely (successful AI research suggests that intelligence requires a body and an environment of some kind), but its unnecessary. Ditch the AI, and explore the possibilities of a Stephenson style distributed network. That's at least theoretically possible.
Posted by: Cian | April 29, 2010 at 09:54 AM
Thanks for the link!
BenSix, you're the first person I know of who's ever had that particular reaction to my name,
Cian: Actually, I expressed some misgiving with the deus ex machina premise at the end. But I enjoyed the book because, leaving aside the Daemon's role in kick-starting it, the system itself (resilient communities linked through a Darknet) was so close to the kind of thing Robb discusses.
Posted by: Kevin Carson | April 29, 2010 at 08:47 PM
Yeah but its a darknet which requires a benevolent AI to run/maintain it. Which is cheating. Any program of political change that requires a god is a bit of a non-starter.
It would be more interesting to start from where we are. Both totally dark, and semi-transparent nets exist. Plenty of them engaged in illegal activities, and mostly unmonitored by the authorities. What do you do with that, and how is that useful. Its not really a problem of technologies, but organisation and ideology. The best hope for anarchists would seem to be the open-source movement, but they're mostly a bunch of unreconstructed Randian/Mises freaks (Mises for fucks sakes. Not even Hayek, but Mises).
Posted by: Cian | April 29, 2010 at 09:17 PM
I didn't realise you'd written a new book Kevin. Looks interesting, shall read.
Posted by: Cian | April 29, 2010 at 09:19 PM
I never really thought of the review or the book in terms of straight politics: more as a survey of the current state of the libertarian imagination. It's interesting that a book from this quarter makes corporations the villains.
Incidentally, Kevin, what do you make of John Robb's politics? I can't really work them out. he seems to be evolving from that obsolescent Wired type vulgar techie libertarianism to some form of...I dunno, anti-state socialism with an odd redneck twist.
Posted by: jamie | April 29, 2010 at 09:36 PM
Kevin - I don't think they're big in the States.
Posted by: BenSix | April 29, 2010 at 11:31 PM
BenSix - I can't see that video here in Canada, but by any chance does it tell us that Tipper Gore was a friend of mine?
Posted by: hellblazer | April 30, 2010 at 06:14 AM
Yeah fair enough Jamie. I'm in a bad mood after wasting a morning reading some MIT media lab papers.
Posted by: cian | April 30, 2010 at 01:51 PM
BenSix: BTW, after my last comment I thought of the Seinfeld episode where Kramer had an odd reaction to the opening credits on Entertainment Tonight.
Cian: I don't think the Daemon's necessary to maintain the Darknet once it was established. And there's no reason the basic architecture couldn't be built without a Daemon. After all, in the story it was based on a multi-player gaming architecture by real world humans recruited by the Daemon. There's no reason in principle they couldn't have done the same thing themselves, or that local community meshworks couldn't set up some sort of common virtual space accessible through connected goggles.
Jamie: I think Robb's coming from some place similar to Vail and Ronfeldt when it comes to describing networked resistance and 4G warfare. His goals seem to be a mix of the techno-utopianism you describe with localist economics and micromanufacturing. I find most of it pretty appealing.
Posted by: Kevin Carson | May 01, 2010 at 06:58 PM