Well, this is all very cold war redux:
In the run-up to a visit by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Vietnam this week arrested two bloggers, refused to release another blogger after he completed a prison sentence, and convicted three labor activists and six Catholic villagers in human rights-related cases.
Several of those imprisoned are anti-Chinese nationalists and the article quotes analysts to the effect that this represents infighting in the VCP, ie an attempt by pro-Chinese factions to derail progress made by pro-American factions. In other words, there is a “good”, ie pro-American communist party and a “bad”, ie pro-Chinese communist party. Naturally, it’s the second one that’s arresting all the dissidents. Personally, I think that there’s just one Vietnamese Communist Party and that it’s doing what communist parties do, namely keeping control: especially of something so potentially explosive as an anti-Chinese turn in policy, assuming that this is what’s happening. This is actually quite typical of how the CPC behaves in China in the sense that it removes inconvenient people from the scene at times when it is attracting international attention. There also seems to be some buy in here from American sources:
Some U.S. experts worry that if the Obama administration presses Vietnam too much on human rights, it could derail the hard-won progress in the relationship.
For many people in non-government organizations and the human rights community, "Vietnam is a kickable China," said Brantly Womack, professor of politics at the University of Virginia. "It's an easy target."
"derailing hard won progress": that's how political science types used to talk about China. And for one reason and another, China has had a pretty good kicking over the past few months. But I suppose we must indulge the crimes of our new friends. On which subject, see also.
Most officials on Capitol Hill and human rights advocates received no warning or explanation prior to the Obama administration's quiet announcement Monday that it would waive sanctions against four countries that forcibly recruit child soldiers. However, an internal State Department document obtained by The Cable sheds light on the reasons behind the Obama administration's decision to pull back on a bill that Barack Obama himself co-sponsored as a senator.
The internal document shows that the administration prepared detailed justifications for its decision to waive sanctions against countries that forcibly recruit child soldiers, arguing that working closely with troubled militaries is the best way to reform them and that U.S. security depends on such relationships.
I like that: troubled militaries. They’re just crazy, mixed up, heavily armed kids.
Recent Comments