Great piece from Robbie Barnett on Xi Jinping’s visit to Tibet, illustrating why the development argument makes no difference to the proximate causes of local antagonism to China:
The ceremony included speeches by three other Chinese leaders and one Tibetan, a local village chief, as well as a parade of marching students, militia and the military. It lasted for at least 147 minutes, according to the television footage, during which time everyone applauded on cue, at the end of each section of each speech. It must have been quite hot or tiring because some Tibetans in the square can be seen holding their heads in their hands and being comforted by other members of the audience. Occasionally one or two people get up and move, but for the most part, no one leaves his or her assigned spot. At the back of the crowd one can even see synchronized displays—words spelled out by rows of people holding up different characters that form huge slogans saying “We thank the Chinese People” and “Tibet’s Future Will be Better.” One could be forgiven at times for thinking that Lhasa had been taken over not by Beijing but by Pyongyang.
...Everyone can understand why China is proud of improving Tibetan infrastructure and wants to maintain its rule over Tibet, but it is not clear why its leaders, or even ordinary Chinese, expect forcing Tibetans to stage rituals of mass gratitude to Xi Jinping and the Chinese government not to fuel resentment.
I think it might be a legitimation thing. What Xi appears to be doing here is following in Hu Jintao’s footsteps: Hu was famously talent spotted by Deng Xiaoping as Party Secretary in Tibet while wearing a tin hat and threatening dire consequences to rebellious Tibetans in the uprising of March 1989, which he duly delivered. A lot of Hu’s close political circle seems to have come up with or via a stints in Tibet, Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia.
Xi, by contrast, has no roots in the CYL faction, is a princeling and rose through using those connections to deliver results in central and Eastern provinces. He is, in short, a bit of a soft lad, who has never been out on the frontiers showing a firm hand to the ethnics and making the desert bloom. Hence maybe the necessity of some mass ritual domination in Tibet to set the stage for his accession to Hu’s position.
Recent Comments