The results of the preliminary round of the hundred metre suspect device smuggling are in:
The government has ordered an inquiry into security at London's Olympic park after a worker reportedly smuggled a fake bomb onto the site.
The man, who has been employed at the site for several years, allegedly carried an artificial bomb in the cabin of his digger through two checkpoints without being searched by security staff.
Missiles on roofs, aircraft carriers in the Thames, chancers with fake bombs. This is what happens when you turn it into the security Olympics; we’re not expecting victory this summer. We’re expecting fatalities, and not from Notional Terror Muslims either.
The Olympics is a bit of a curse. It probably did more to make people suspicious of China than any other event since Tiananmen. Cases like Chen Guangcheng don’t make much impact here because we’ve been conditioned to think of China as simultaneously a chronic human rights abuser and as a place of opportunity. These parallel lines were supposed to merge through a large vague process of Opening Up, at which point everything would be better. In the meantime, all this human rights stuff shows that they have Much to Learn.
So back in 2008, the Tibetan protests and the attempts to label Beijing as the ‘genocide Olympics’ led less to a conviction that the Games shouldn’t have been held there than to a vague feeling that they would be ramshackle and bit Third-Worldy. They were a pat on the head games.
Obviously Beijing had different ideas about that and conducted the whole horrible gala with an efficiency of the kind historically referred to as Teutonic. Everything went like clockwork, the home country gobbled up a huge number of gold medals and the exorbitant costs were swallowed without a belch. Look, everyone: we can do this. There was a distinct shift at this point from the feeling that China should be encouraged to the suspicion that it should be watched. People were broadly OK with the idea that China should hold the games. The idea that it could hold a successful games seemed to be harder to accept, even though the Olympics is generally a pretty good fit for the skill set and social aspirations of any halfway functioning dictatorship.
Ed Howker at the Groan puts things quite nicely. Ticketing and security remain the two large and indelible stains on what could be a decent sports festival.
I had tickets for a 'test event' on Saturday: got them by chance since someone at the office has a family member who works for a Tier 1 sponsor. It wasn't a popular event, so they got passed on. This is how many, if not most of the Olympics attendees are going to be getting in: they'll happen to know someone. If you're really favoured (unlike me and my partner) it'll be the 100 metres, or the opening ceremony. And thus is an antique, non-transparent, anti-egalitarian, anti-market way of doing things planted into our society's core.
On a lighter note, Twenty Twelve was great. Wish they'd make more. Head of Deliverance is pretty close to the mark.
Posted by: Charlie W | May 07, 2012 at 02:30 PM
Also, am struggling to see how it's a good idea to sell the Olympic Village at a loss (£275M, reportedly) to the Qatari sovereign wealth fund. Couldn't the taxpayer just rent the place out for thirty years? No DSS - even - if the taxpayer is feeling especially mean. Are there just no private renters in that part of town?
Posted by: Charlie W | May 07, 2012 at 04:42 PM
Qatari Diar (who bought the Olympic Village and Chelsea Barracks)<> Qatar Holding which are equal to Qatar Investment Authority (who bought CSFB's HQ a few months back), which is entirely unrelated to Qatar National Bank (50% owned by the State of Qatar) who are financing the Shard. But Qatari Diar have particularly close links to the prime minister. It's all a bit incestuous.
Posted by: Richard J | May 07, 2012 at 04:57 PM
I do like the idea of the hundred metres suspect device smuggling. Perhaps also the electric fence pole vault, the throwing the molotov or whatever else people can think up?
Posted by: guthrie | May 07, 2012 at 06:26 PM
Old cold war gag: yesterday the east german pole vault champion became the west german pole vault champion. I thank you.
Posted by: chris williams | May 07, 2012 at 06:55 PM
Ticketing and security remain the two large and indelible stains on what could be a decent sports festival.
In fairness, ticketing and security are always the problems with any kind of festival.
Posted by: dsquared | May 07, 2012 at 07:30 PM
They'll be issues, it's true. But I'd like to see the Glastonbury organisers announce that they've reserved half the tickets for sponsors. And their friends. And their friends. So as to be able to afford fancier stage lighting.
Posted by: Charlie | May 07, 2012 at 11:20 PM
Saying that the Olympics are unpleasantly elitist in spirit is like complaining that everyone involved with London Fashion Week is obsessed with clothes. Look at the motto for heaven's sake. Citius Altius Fortior is not Latin for "I'm OK, you're OK". Competitive athletics is inherently nasty and the Olympics are the essence of it.
Posted by: ajay | May 08, 2012 at 07:11 AM
Perhaps also the electric fence pole vault, the throwing the molotov or whatever else people can think up?
Private Eye did this gag about a year ago. They got something wrong though, can't remember what.
Saying that the Olympics are unpleasantly elitist in spirit is like complaining that everyone involved with London Fashion Week is obsessed with clothes.
Well no. That would be like complaining that everybody at the Olympics was obsessed with sport.
Also, the motto doesn't necessarily mean "faster (etc) than other people". (I don't entirely disagree with you, I have all sorts of issues with the Olympics, but I think the specific points you're making aren't all that Fortius.)
Posted by: ejh | May 08, 2012 at 09:04 AM
In a reformed Olympics, the flag raising / national anthem playing would have to go. Also: a medal for the most improved athlete.
Posted by: Charlie W | May 08, 2012 at 09:18 AM
In fairness, ticketing and security are always the problems with any kind of festival.
Well, they're always important issues that deserve attention but that's different from saying that they're always problems.
In a reformed Olympics, the flag raising / national anthem playing would have to go.
Absolutely. And the ludicrous/creepy torch ceremony. And the IOC in general.
ejh: well, I think the motto thing is arguable. But it's the spirit of the modern Olympics, Latin or not.
Posted by: ajay | May 08, 2012 at 09:51 AM
And the IOC in general.
This surely is the heart of the matter.
Posted by: chris y | May 08, 2012 at 10:41 AM
Yes. I wouldn't mind the Olympics nearly so much if it was a low-key, low-budget event run in a spirit of woolly benevolence and mild ineptitude by some committee of well-meaning Scandinavians. At the moment it looks and acts like an American right-winger's idea of the UN. (Run by corrupt unaccountable foreigners, infringes your civil liberties, bosses your elected officials around, etc)
Posted by: ajay | May 08, 2012 at 11:30 AM
In the short term the whole thing should be put into the experienced hands of the good citizens of Much Wenlock.
Posted by: chris y | May 08, 2012 at 11:50 AM
Splendid idea - I'd never heard of that before. See, that's what I'm talking about.
Posted by: ajay | May 08, 2012 at 11:57 AM
Bollocks to Much Wenlock - the citizens of Chipping Campden have much more experience in running Olympick games, and still remain the world's major centre for at least one Olympick sport (shin kicking).
I am very happy to discover the website "shinkicking.com", and its epigram, written by HJ Massingham on watching the traditional competition at Campden:
"There is no imbecility nor barbarity that human beings will not practise and even exalt, so long as it be sanctified by custom"
Posted by: dsquared | May 08, 2012 at 12:21 PM
New title text?
Posted by: ajay | May 08, 2012 at 12:41 PM
The mascot for this Olympic games, Wenlock, has got to be one of the creepiest I've ever seen. I guess they all seem that way but the cyclops camera eye thing really takes it to new levels.
Posted by: Barry Freed | May 08, 2012 at 01:04 PM
He's a Vermicious Knid.
Posted by: Chris Williams | May 08, 2012 at 02:41 PM
Brr, those scared the hell out of me when I was a kid. Especially the fact that you never actually found out what they would do to you if they caught you. (As Grandma Bucket points out, they can't bite your head off - they haven't any mouths.)
Posted by: ajay | May 08, 2012 at 03:05 PM
So was that your second greatest fear, ajay?
1. Nuclear annihilation.
2. Vermicious Knids.
[apologies for crossing the blog streams here]
Posted by: Barry Freed | May 08, 2012 at 03:39 PM
Centipedes, actually, but I'm dealing with it.
Posted by: ajay | May 08, 2012 at 04:04 PM
The storyteller on Jackanory who said that infinitesimally tiny shards of the Snow Queen's mirror were flying through the air, all around us, right now. HCA may have meant this metaphorically, but it scared the crap out of me for days.
Posted by: Phil | May 08, 2012 at 04:09 PM
Although IANA.
Posted by: Phil | May 08, 2012 at 04:09 PM
Centipede
Posted by: ejh | May 08, 2012 at 04:13 PM
IANA
I Am Not A...?
(I just know this is going to be blindingly obvious).
Posted by: Barry Freed | May 08, 2012 at 04:30 PM
jay
Posted by: Phil | May 08, 2012 at 04:37 PM
Internet Authority for Numbering Assignment?
Posted by: Alex | May 08, 2012 at 04:41 PM
ejh: yep, if I'd come across that book when I was a child, I think it would have broken me.
Posted by: ajay | May 08, 2012 at 04:49 PM