Here's a long, involving look at how China views the world in general and the United States in particular. On a note of irony, its more hawkish young analysts had some of their views shaped by study in the United States:
Third, American theories of international relations have become popular among younger Chinese policy analysts, many of whom have earned advanced degrees in the United States. The most influential body of international relations theory in China is so-called offensive realism, which holds that a country will try to control its security environment to the full extent that its capabilities permit. According to this theory, the United States cannot be satisfied with the existence of a powerful China and therefore seeks to make the ruling regime there weaker and more pro-American. Chinese analysts see evidence of this intent in Washington's calls for democracy and its support for what China sees as separatist movements in Taiwan, Tibet, and Xinjiang.
Strauss and Scmitt have a following in China too, though not so much in state-party circles maybe.
Could it be that America is in the same state that Britain was at the end of WW2. Broke and borrowing.
And so China takes up the Empire role.
Posted by: john malpas | September 02, 2012 at 02:06 AM
john malpas:
But the US isn't broke (legally I suppose it will be if it doesn't raise the debt ceiling).
A better comparison might be to say that China is a little like the US just before the Great Depression (just without the democracy or flappers). And America is where Japan was 15 or so years ago.
As for China becoming the hegemon, I wouldn't count the US out just yet. It's not China, after all, that's bombing funerals in Yemen. And depending on who wins the election, and what's going through Obama's head, there's the prospect of war in Iran or Syria. War in Iran would be ethically and rationally stupid (and probably the same for Syria too) but it wouldn't be unaffordable (hey, killing Iraqis cost $3 trillion, but US Treasuries now have extremely low interest rates). In fact it would be fairly typical War Keynesianism.
Anyway, all this ignores Europe. I say it's a coin toss whether the Eurozone disintegrates or becomes a superpower.
Posted by: A Different Alex | September 02, 2012 at 06:45 PM
The specific problem that China's having right now is that demand from the EU has collapsed to the extent that it's undermining the transition the country's trying to make from an exporting to a consumption-based economy: the end of the cliff they're trying to leap from is showing signs of collapsing under them.
Posted by: jamie | September 02, 2012 at 07:05 PM
Yes. America was the big exporter in the 30s and suffered most from the Depression. The same may happen to China and this should be a warning sign for Germany too.
Posted by: A Different Alex | September 03, 2012 at 02:23 AM