Via Alex,
here’s a link to Alex Massie’s takedown of the ostensibly bizarre howl of
overclass self-pity from Anthony Seldon on the matter of the supposed
oppression of children whose parents are wealthy enough to be educated by dubious
charities.
I say ostensibly because the affair brings to mind something my stepson told me when he
was at Cambridge. Our Alex – Alexes all over in this story –
went to the local comp and so was seized upon by the college authorities to
spread the word among feral youth that they too could have a crack at the
glittering prizes if they were bright enough and maybe did a little less
dicking about. No guarantees: but why not have a go?
This effort
was conducted with a certain amount of discretion, he said, because the
outreach folk were of the belief that if colleges were too aggressive in
seeking out bright kids from state schools, the word would go out among private schools that they were ‘unfriendly’ and these schools would then
encourage their own applicants to apply to other colleges. In other words, a
discreet and unofficial boycott would take place.
I have no
idea how true this perception was or is. But it does put this para of Massie’s into
perspective:
Indeed, remove from the equation the top 30% (say) of those who
gain a place and there is very little difference in aptitude between the
remaining 70% of new students each year and many of those who are not fortunate
enough to be admitted. There are plenty of people – from all types of
background – who are bright enough to go to Oxbridge but who do not get a
place. Hard luck stories abound every year and it’s not unreasonable to suppose
that even the pupils of Wellington College might be expected to
endure their share of disappointment.
Or perhaps not. As a statement, Seldon’s whinge makes no sense,
especially as the current political environment is not exactly redistributive,
except upwards. As an implied threat, however, it has a certain amount of
force. And politically, it’s exactly the right time to make it.
Recent Comments