The Kaulong people, one of the dozens of small populations living along the southern watershed of the Island of New Britain, just East of New Guinea, formerly practised the ritual strangling of widows. When a man died, his widow called upon her brothers to strangle her. She was not nurderously strangled against her will, nor was she pressured into this ritualized form of suicide by other members of her society. Instead, she had grown up observing it as the custom, followed the custom when she became widowed herself, strongly urged her brothers (or her son if she had no brothers) to fulfil their solemn obligation to strangle her despite their natural reluctance, and sat co-operatively while they did strangle her.
From The World Until Yesterday, Jared Diamond's latest. I'm interviewing him tomorrow so I won't be blogging until very late at least.
Anyway, should be an interesting chat.
Does Adidas Porsche Design S2 have a sole?
Stephen Corry didn't like the book.
Savaging Primitives: Why Jared Diamond’s ‘The World Until Yesterday’ Is Completely Wrong
Posted by: dick gregory | February 01, 2013 at 07:37 AM
seems a fearful waste of widows especially if young
Posted by: john malpas | February 02, 2013 at 12:11 AM
Yeah, I just bet the widow was entirely cooperative every time. Er, no. If it's anything like sati in India, there were a lot of cases where she was either drugged out of her mind or struggling until her last breath.
Posted by: ajay | February 02, 2013 at 08:35 AM
While all ajay says is true, the weird thing about sati is that it was voluntary in a sizeable majority of cases ("drugged out of her mind" was obviously common, but not particularly relevant: if I'd decided when sober that I was going to burn myself alive, I'd still want to be as high as balls for the main event). Because indoctrination and the threat of social disapproval are more powerful tools than physical coercion.
Posted by: john b | February 02, 2013 at 11:22 AM
I'm not sure how meaningful it is to say it was voluntary if the threat of social disapproval was a major motivation.
Posted by: a3t | February 02, 2013 at 12:37 PM
Completely fair point, but one that absolutely ties in with what Diamond says and goes against what Ajay says.
Posted by: john b | February 02, 2013 at 01:14 PM
Completely fair point, but one that absolutely ties in with what Diamond says and goes against what Ajay says.
No. What Diamond actually says is "She was not nurderously strangled against her will, nor was she pressured into this ritualized form of suicide by other members of her society." He specifically rules out social pressure.
Widows in Hindu India were treated appallingly badly, to the point where death probably did seem like a fairly acceptable alternative. And I'd like to know what happened to Kaulong widows who decided not to be strangled.
Posted by: ajay | February 04, 2013 at 10:30 AM
I suspect "cake" was not on the menu.
Posted by: Barry Freed | February 04, 2013 at 11:19 AM
"Social pressure" is a bit meaningless here, since it ranges from mild disapproval to being expelled from the tribe to live as a hermit and/or die in a ditch.
Posted by: john b | February 04, 2013 at 12:36 PM