Boss, boss. There’s trouble in’t triangle:
Thousands of people have fled from northern Burma into China after fighting erupted between government troops and an armed ethnic group yesterday, breaking a 20-year ceasefire. Witnesses in the Chinese border town of Nansan, in southern Yunnan province, reported hearing further gunfire today.
Officials said about 10,000 refugees had arrived from Kokang, a mostly ethnically Chinese region where many Chinese nationals also do business, in the last few days.
Burma became Myanmar partly as a result of a grand bargain between the junta and various of its ethnic antagonists in 1989, whereby they stopped fighting the central government while it acknowledged their de facto autonomy, including the right to maintain their own militias. Burma became the Union of Myanmar, ostensibly in order to suggest that the country wasn’t just the state of the ethnic Burmese. This is why I’m mildly annoyed at the decision that seems to have been taken to unilaterally rename it Burma. Myanmar isn't just a piece of dictatorial frippery. There was a real, consequential process behind the namechange. But whatever. Take that, State Peace and Development Council. There’s an informative and confusing wiki about the whole thing here.
But I digress. What appears to be behind this is an attempt by the junta to forcibly merge the militias into a border security force under tatmadaw control, starting with the Kokang region which according to Irrawaddy has the smallest and weakest militia. Nonetheless, they resisted with the help of their neighbours the Wa. The flood of refugees is a consequence of the fighting. According to the latest Irrawaddy report the ethnic Kokang forces have now surrendered to Chinese border authorities. Most of the refugees appear to be Chinese nationals, who control much of the economy of the border regions.
Beijing is something of a patron of the border peoples, backing the Wa insurgency up until 1989 before profiting from closer economic ties consequent to the peace deal with Yangon. It’s position on the current disturbances appears to be the usual: let’s stop squabbling and go back to making money instead. I doubt that China particularly wants tatmadaw controlled troops on its border, but its ability to act is somewhat limited by the fact that Beijing’s biggest rival for patronage and sponsorship in Myanmar is India. The Sino-Indian great game looms once more…
Anyway, here’s a first hand account of the action from its beginning in the first week of August translated from a Chinese blog by Roland Soong.
And if Yangon still wants a scrap, these boys are probably next on the agenda.
I'd be very wary about taking on the Wa. The Brits tried to map the Wa country around 1900, but anyone they sent in there tended to lose his head. It's pretty much the definition of wild country, and if Yangon and Beijing have never really been able to subdue the area, some accomodation with the tribesmen would seem the sensible way to go.
OT, but what do you make of the Dalai's planned visit to Taiwan? My instinct is that it's a bit of a stunt on the part of the DPP.
Posted by: Splintered Sunrise | August 29, 2009 at 09:41 PM
"My instinct is that it's a bit of a stunt on the part of the DPP."
I don't know if the DPP were behind the invite, though most of the affected area is DPP controlled at local level. But Ma and the KMT seem to have anticipated this by saying he's perfectly welcome. And there's been nothing from Beijing but ritual protests so far, AFAIK. The pro-China people on Taiwain seem to have learned to roll with the punches over the past few years.
Posted by: jamie | August 30, 2009 at 04:07 PM
Ah, right. Taiwan is not really my strong suit.
Just looking at The Dictionary of Language, under the chapter for "Wa":
"Facts on the Wa country, including its population, are still hard to assemble. Outsiders have not found it easy to get to grips with Wa political philosophy. The British, for example, who annexed the region in the 1890s, could not understand why the village rulers (often given the Shan title Sawbwa) would not identify themselves to strangers. Sometimes they disappeared; sometimes they were actually there among the villagers, but unidentifiable...
"A further problem has been the prevalence of headhunting. During a China-Burma border delineation in 1900 Wa warriors captured two British heads in a daring raid near a Chinese market town. These two heads were still objects of worship sixty years later."
Doesn't sound like the sort of territory that would really be amenable to tatmadaw control - the autonomous militia system may have been the most sensible option.
Posted by: Splintered Sunrise | August 30, 2009 at 04:41 PM
One group which did manage to have some kind of influence over the WA were the old Burmese Communist Party who led them in the fight against Yangon for many years until 1989. That's how the CPC managed to gain influence over them as well. And most of the economyin the Wa area is ethnically Chinese dominated as well. I'm not sure what Beijing's current policy on the Wa is, and I guess that most of it would be left to the Yunnan Provincial government. But I bet it's a priority not to have streams of Wa refugees coming over their side of the border.
Turns out that the DPP did invite the Dalai to Taiwan after all, but he's not meeting any politicians from either party. Some pro-China fringe groups are protesting his visit, but a lot of these seem to be conneted to the KMT's ultra fringe, so I gess the idea is to make the leadership look moderate and sensible.
Posted by: jamie | August 30, 2009 at 05:11 PM
Lordy, KMT fenqing... *shakes head*
Posted by: Splintered Sunrise | August 30, 2009 at 06:50 PM
A lot of them are apparently cadre from the Laodongdang, the Taiwan Labour Party, which was founded back in 1987.The KMT were worried at that time about pro-democratic/pro-independence activism, so after thirty years of suppressing all labour activism a socialist party was suddeny allowed to spring into operation, duly leftwing on most issues but replicating exactly the militant KMT on the reunification issue. They used to be a ubiquitous part of the tour that KMT gave visiting politicians back in the late eighties/early nineties.
That project obviously didn't work, but evidently they're still around.
Posted by: jamie | August 30, 2009 at 07:43 PM