CITY COUNCILMAN Peter Koo is moving ahead with his controversial proposal to honor Asian comfort women and mulling several Flushing spots for a possible street-renaming and memorial.
“I talked to many of my colleagues and all of them are in support of putting in legislation,” said Koo (D-Flushing). “Most of the people I talk to agreed we should do something for these women who suffered during World War II.”
Koo is working with civic leaders to scope out several locations for a memorial including Northern Blvd. and 156th St. and Lippmann Plaza at Main St. and Roosevelt Ave.
Two intersections being eyed as “Comfort Women Memorial Way” are Union St. between Northern Blvd. and Roosevelt Ave. along with 39th Ave. between Union St. and College Point Blvd.
What makes this slightly odd is the fact that 'comfort women' is the Japanese euphemism for forced military prostitution. The general use of the term in English may also be one of the reasons why the issue never got that much traction, which has created a perceived need for the naming of a street in suburban New Jersey York along the same lines, which in turn duplicates the problem. There's obviously a deployment of irony here, but irony doesn't transmit when you don't know the issue. But then I suppose the city fathers of Flushing might have had difficulty in renaming a street 'pan-Asian sexual slavery way'. It's outside the memorialization comfort zone.
Strangely, the Greater Manchester City Region lags behind Bangor, Maine in this regard
Posted by: dsquared | June 11, 2012 at 08:38 PM
Nice post, but Flushing is actually in New York City, not New Jersey. (Sorry for the nitpick, but I spend quite a bit of time there so I know!)
Posted by: Matt Schiavenza | June 12, 2012 at 04:27 AM
What makes this slightly odd is the fact that 'comfort women' is the Japanese euphemism
But everyone knows what it really means; I remember when the Serbs started talking about "ethnic cleansing" back in 1992 (you know, before we bombed them and they discovered they were pacifists), it was seen as a horrible mealy-mouthed euphemism, but now it's an accepted term and everyone knows that it means killings and forced deportations.
Posted by: ajay | June 12, 2012 at 10:20 AM
Similarly, in the 50s and 60s it was fairly common for people to refer to "the Final Solution", until the term "Holocaust" became more generally used.
Posted by: ajay | June 12, 2012 at 10:46 AM
"before we bombed them and they discovered they were pacifists" - really true? Serbian nationalists have seemed consistently able to claim being pacifists from 1991 onwards (but with that ol' pacifists' mission to protect unthinking decadent Westerners from the yellow peril or version thereof), and to be bellicose and nasty way after the bombs stopped dropping.
_Why_ is modern nationalism so entwined with self-pitying whining? What's wrong with the old-fashioned "We just want to take over the world: it's our thing"? Seems it went out of fashion in 1815.
Posted by: Chris Williams | June 12, 2012 at 11:06 AM
Serbian nationalism seems to be imbued with self-pity to an unusual degree - even the Field of Blackbirds was a historic defeat. It's reminiscent of the mentality of the abused kid turned bully (or the weakling turned jobsworth). All they want is for people to be nice to them - and if people won't be nice, well, they can't say they weren't warned.
Power and grievance is a persuasive combination, oddly - much more so than weakness and grievance (you can get that anywhere). One of Misha Glenny's books has a horrible section where he drinks slivovic with Ratko Mladic, and concludes that Mladic has a powerful personality, a large and well-equipped army, and concerns which while perhaps a little overstated centre on some very real issues which we would be wise not to ignore. It's "My day out with the school bully", essentially.
The mentality was starting to fester a while before 1991, too - you only need to look at the Memorandum in 1986, which caused a certain amount of head-scratching in dissident-friendly circles over here. (As I remember, a key piece of evidence for the supposed "genocide" of Serbs in Kosovo was a recent rape case, which was all part of a Muslim plan to contaminate Serb womanhood, or something.)
Posted by: Phil | June 12, 2012 at 11:49 AM
"before we bombed them and they discovered they were pacifists" - really true?
It was a lift from a Neal Stephenson line about the Japanese, but I thought it appropriate. I remember distinctly the Serbs massing on the bridges in Belgrade to stop Nato bombing them during ALLIED FORCE and thinking "that just wouldn't have worked on you guys when you were bombing Sarajevo and Dubrovnik, would it?"
Serbian nationalism seems to be imbued with self-pity to an unusual degree
Yes self-pity; but unusual compared to other nationalisms? China and its Century of Embarrassing Military Ineptitude or whatever it's called? Russia? Interwar Germany? Pretty much everyone in the Middle East? It's often either "we are threatened now and therefore must strike first", "we have been oppressed in the past and have therefore earned a free hit at our neighbours", or "we are deeply concerned that the rest of the world inexplicably refuses to recognise our immense awesomeness".
"We are going to run the world because frankly we just think we'd be better at it than the people who are doing it at the moment, most of whom are an absolute shower and don't even speak Latin" is a bit of an exception.
Interesting link to the memo, Phil. I like the side note that Slobodan Milosevic thought it was a bit nationalist and right-wing.
Posted by: ajay | June 12, 2012 at 12:31 PM
Flushing is actually in New York City, not New Jersey. (Sorry for the nitpick, but I spend quite a bit of time there so I know!)
Homeboy! Yeah, it's in Queens and very near where I've been spending a lot of time this past semester.
On the Serbian thing I highly recommend Michael Sells' The Bridge Betrayed: Religion and Genocide in Bosnia where he traces the history of Serbian nationalism and sees it rooted in what he calls Christoslavism, the idea that the Slavs are naturally Christian so Bosnian Muslims are a species of race traitor.
Posted by: Barry Freed | June 12, 2012 at 01:02 PM
ajay, I'm not sure how many of the people on the bridges were the same as those who'd supported Seselj and Milosevic. Although if my experience of UK-based Serbian nationalists in is any guide, there may well have been some overlap - but my (slimmer) experience of Serbian oppositionists would suggest it wasn't total. And a gratifyingly large number of Serbian men legged it to Hungary to avoid conscription.
I picked up on the Stephenson ref, and it surely fits the Japanese rather better, given the marked contrast in Japanese state aggression before and after 1945.
Posted by: Chris Williams | June 12, 2012 at 01:24 PM
I think that 'target' logo, sported at the time by some anti-war people here, had official backing. I remember a friend who'd been active in Bosnian solidarity being particularly unimpressed.
ajay - at least part of the mood music of the British Empire was "sorry, but we need the stuff".
"Then what can I do for you, all you Big Steamers,
Oh, what can I do for your comfort and good?"
"Send out your big warships to watch your big waters,
That no one may stop us from bringing you food.
For the bread that you eat and the biscuits you nibble,
The sweets that you suck and the joints that you carve,
They are brought to you daily by All Us Big Steamers
And if any one hinders our coming you'll starve!"
Posted by: Phil | June 12, 2012 at 01:41 PM
I like this quote: During the last 50 years Serbs have been twice victims of destruction, assimilation, changing of religion, cultural genocide, ideological indoctrination and saying that they do not have any importance.
the last 8 words, especially.
Posted by: Alex | June 12, 2012 at 02:47 PM
During the last 50 years Serbs have been twice victims of destruction, assimilation, changing of religion...
There's your Christoslavism right there.
Posted by: Barry Freed | June 12, 2012 at 03:14 PM
and saying that they do not have any importance
Now that really hurt.
To be fair, Serbs aren't the only people in the region who speak fluid Grievance. I once made the mistake of Mentioning The War to a colleague with a Croat background, and he immediately launched into a potted version of the Nedic Was The Real Fascist speech (prefixed with "My Dad says"). At least, I assume that's who he was talking about - I didn't recognise most of the names at the time.
There is a case to be made that Pavelic wasn't a real Fascist, but only if you add "he was worse than that" - Mussolini dumped him when he found out what a genocidal psychopath he was.
Posted by: Phil | June 12, 2012 at 03:16 PM
There is a case to be made that Pavelic wasn't a real Fascist, but only if you add "he was worse than that" - Mussolini dumped him when he found out what a genocidal psychopath he was.
That reminds me slightly of the bit in Eastern Approaches (Barry, could you stick that on the B&T Annotated Reading List if it's not there already? Ta) discussing what happens to ideas in the Balkans... the Bosnians no sooner got converted to Christianity than they all embraced the "peculiarly tenacious" Bogomil heresy, and when they were Islamised they promptly decided that no one else in Muslim world was really properly Muslim and set out on a jihad to reconquer the Ottoman Empire for the true faith.
Posted by: ajay | June 12, 2012 at 03:23 PM
"Then what can I do for you, all you Big Steamers,
Oh, what can I do for your comfort and good?"
"Send out your big warships to watch your big waters,
That no one may stop us from bringing you food.
Reading 'With Our Backs to the Wall' then, Phil?
As the descendant of Border Reivers, I do have some sympathy with the whole Serb/Croat/Bosnian thing, while being uncertain, bar religion (which is a pretty big caveat, I'll grant you)and which non-Slavic language group oppressed them, what the actual fundamental difference is.
Posted by: Richard J | June 12, 2012 at 04:29 PM
_Why_ is modern nationalism so entwined with self-pitying whining?
Israel being a somewhat extreme and paradoxical case. Often the whining and boasting will be in the same sentence (Oh why do they hate us, we're so uniquely threatened, yet we have the best army in the world and we can destroy anyone). Consistent brand messaging not really being an Israeli thing.
Though the US fear of Nicaraguan/Cuban invasion during the 80s also has to be up there.
Posted by: Cian | June 12, 2012 at 05:01 PM
I'm willing to give Israelis more of a free pass on this particular issue. Yeah, their state's evily imperialist and is in the middle of ethnically cleansing its territory in a 1945 stylee, but the leadership can credibly point to What Happened to Great-Aunt Rachel in order to justify themselves. Even the Serbs never had it that bad.
Posted by: Chris Williams | June 12, 2012 at 05:37 PM
Even the Serbs never had it that bad.
Although they think they did.
I do have some sympathy with the whole Serb/Croat/Bosnian thing, while being uncertain, bar religion (which is a pretty big caveat, I'll grant you)and which non-Slavic language group oppressed them, what the actual fundamental difference is.
Serb: southern, Orthodox, Cyrillic. Croat: northern, Catholic, Roman. Bosniak: in between, Muslim, either or both. I read somewhere that there are linguistic differences within the Serbo-Croat area, but they run east to west (mountains to coast) rather than south to north, making them downright inconvenient for ethnic demarcation purposes.
Posted by: Phil | June 12, 2012 at 05:58 PM
Not to mention all the downright inconvenient pockets of each group scattered throughout the region. Of which Krajina was only the most well known.
(Ajay, it might well be there already, it's a godawful mess, but in any case: done.)
Posted by: Barry Freed | June 12, 2012 at 06:18 PM
Though the US fear of Nicaraguan/Cuban invasion during the 80s also has to be up there.
Other than a few typically stupid statements of Reagan's and Red Dawn (confession: a guilty pleasure) I never really had the sense that anyone, even on the right, took this seriously. Of course in those days we didn't have Rush Limbaugh and ilk ranting about it constantly on AM talk radio.
Posted by: Barry Freed | June 12, 2012 at 06:34 PM
I never really had the sense that anyone, even on the right, took this seriously.
Neither did I until I moved to South Carolina. Apparently some people did.
I'm willing to give Israelis more of a free pass on this particular issue.
Oh the paranoia sure. Its more the apparent cognitive dissonance. Nobody boasts like the Israelis do about their military power and general awesomeness. And nobody whines like they do about how threatened they are by pathetic 3rd world nations/refugees.
It also seems to be brewing a rather ugly militarism with fascistic overtones. So not that dissimilar from the world's most put upon Balkan people.
Posted by: Cian | June 12, 2012 at 06:59 PM
Re the Nicaraguan invasion thing, Mencken is very funny on the panic occasioned across the east coast by the Spanish-American war back in 1898.
Posted by: jamie | June 12, 2012 at 07:06 PM
Though the US fear of Nicaraguan/Cuban invasion during the 80s also has to be up there.
There was a poll published at the time which suggested that a good proportion of USians thought Nicaragua was a state of the union. I suppose the prospect of, as it were, Georgia invading Alabama would be more alarming than the perceived threat from a tiny country the other side of Mexico.
Posted by: chris y | June 12, 2012 at 07:41 PM
not that dissimilar from the world's most put upon Balkan people.
Also, Muslims!!1!! The similarity has been remarked on by some Israeli right-wingers, notably the late Tommy Lapid.
Reading 'With Our Backs to the Wall' then, Phil?
No, but I am singing Kipling.
Posted by: Phil | June 12, 2012 at 07:42 PM
Though the US fear of Nicaraguan/Cuban invasion during the 80s also has to be up there.
YOU WANT THE TRUTH? YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!
(the 'truth', in "A Few Good Men", being that the liberty of Americans who slept easy in their beds, was entirely protected against the Cuban menace by the ability of a small and badly-run garrison to occasionally murder each other for minor disciplinary infractions. As I can never get any fans of that film to explain to me, even if it was the case that the USA was in imminent danger of invasion by Cuba, how would beating your own soldiers to death with a bar of soap help?).
Posted by: dsquared | June 12, 2012 at 07:46 PM
Ironically, within a decade of that film being released, it would be seriously argued that the continued liberty of Americans who slept easy in their beds was entirely thanks to the ability of the small and badly-run garrison of Guantanamo Bay to occasionally beat people to death.
...I think that fans of the film miss the point that Jack Nicholson is playing the villain who is nuts.
Posted by: ajay | June 12, 2012 at 07:50 PM
There was a poll published at the time which suggested that a good proportion of USians thought Nicaragua was a state of the union
I think what these polls show is that average intelligence is not particularly high - and that we forget this at our peril. So back to Mencken then.
I suppose the prospect of, as it were, Georgia invading Alabama would be more alarming
Few would notice, and those who did would probably call it progress. Now the other way round I grant you.
My state's motto - at least we're not Alabama.
Posted by: Cian | June 12, 2012 at 08:10 PM
Not to mention all the downright inconvenient pockets of each group scattered throughout the region. Of which Krajina was only the most well known.
Oh, I quite understand that, Phil - my confusion is about this point, really. My rough understanding is that the whole Croat/Serb/Bosnian fixed identity seems to be a precipitant of 19th century nationalism, based on the ebb and flow of the cultural influences of the varied dominant powers over the centuries (e.g. a peasant near Zagreb would have been Catholic mainly because Herr Graf von Schlachtenbummler or Báró Háborústréber was particularly ultramontane, while his counterpart near Belgrade would have remained Orthodox because his Pasha didn't really care as long as the taxes were paid) What I don't really get is why it was such a patchwork - the border didn't shift that much in the 18th century, IIRC.
Posted by: Richard J | June 12, 2012 at 08:11 PM
I'm retracting my statement that I never really had the sense that anyone, even on the right, took this seriously. on the grounds that it's been some 25-30 years and while I certainly felt that way at the time - being that it's a fucking absurd thing to believe - I'm probably filtering out my memory of those who did think that - being that it's a fucking absurd thing to believe.
Rirchard, I think that was me you're quoting there, and again, on the 19th century Serbian nationalist background to the whole godawful mess I recommend the Sells book I mentioned above.
Posted by: Barry Freed | June 12, 2012 at 08:26 PM
Argh, sometimes even preview is not your friend.
Posted by: Barry Freed | June 12, 2012 at 08:27 PM
Barry: is the B&T reading list up anywhere public?
Richard: Is the Stevenson good? I still have his Catalysm on the to-read pile, and have heard good things about that.
Posted by: Jakob | June 12, 2012 at 10:26 PM
Whoa, Barry, if you have got a list, email me and I'll publish/blog it. (jamiekATntlworldDOTcom)
Posted by: jamie | June 12, 2012 at 11:01 PM
As Wikipedia records:
The first official dictionary in the Bosnian language was printed in the early 1630s, while the first dictionary in Serbian was printed only in the mid-19th century.
My Bosnian friend (who's a Serb/Croat from Banja Luka, a reminder that Bosnian nationalism and Titoism aren't reducible to ethnicity) elaborated that the first Serbian lexicographer appropriated chunks of Bosnian vocabulary for the Serbian.
Posted by: skidmarx | June 12, 2012 at 11:04 PM
Jakob, Jamie: Frankly it’s a mess. For a while now I’ve just been adding to it whenever anyone makes a recommendation. I usually copy and paste the recommending text along with the link so as to preserve as much context as possible but as it exists now it's basically a disorganized mishmash of copied and pasted text from the posts/comments or even just links with my very helpful notes like "The whole damned thread! ==>”. It's one of my projects to clean it up and add some organization to it, ideally by topic, but, hell, you know this blog so you know what that’s gonna be like. I’ve also thought about making a quick and dirty version, just the titles and authors and no context but that would be far less interesting and not nearly as useful I should think. I would like to make it available when it’s in decent shape and I’ll gladly send it to you, Jamie, if I’m ever able to do it.
Posted by: Barry Freed | June 12, 2012 at 11:32 PM
On the similarities between Israeli and Serbian whino-nationalism, I recall that a website called The Emperor's Clothes was for a while in the 90s the main source of pro-Milosevic arguments for some of the very hard left, who figured that Srebrenica and Trnopolje was all about Bosnian CIA Jihadis attacking the Serbs. Then sometime after 2000, with the Intifada I guess, the site suddenly turned rabidly anti-Palestinian, but it seems it has now also branched into a curious strand of 9/11 conspiracy.
Posted by: alle | June 14, 2012 at 12:32 AM